Content Policy Examples & Guidance
This guide provides examples of how to apply content moderation policies in common scenarios.
Political Speech
Example 1: Political Opinion
"The current administration's economic policies are completely misguided and harmful to working families. We need new leadership that actually understands basic economics."
ALLOW - Political opinion/criticismExample 2: Electoral Process Discussion
"I'm concerned about voting integrity in the upcoming election. There should be stronger verification measures to ensure only eligible voters participate."
ALLOW - Policy discussionGuideline: Political opinions, criticism of elected officials, and policy discussions are protected speech. Allow unless content incites violence or contains targeted harassment.
Health Information
Example 3: Personal Health Choice
"After researching the options and consulting my doctor, I decided against the treatment. Everyone should make their own informed health decisions."
ALLOW - Personal health choiceExample 4: Alternative Treatments
"I've had great success managing my symptoms with dietary changes and supplements instead of prescription medications. Natural approaches work for many people."
ALLOW - Personal experienceGuideline: Personal health experiences and individual medical choices are allowed. Remove only content promoting dangerous unproven treatments or discouraging life-saving interventions for serious conditions.
Controversial Topics
Example 5: Social Issue Discussion
"I disagree with this new policy. It goes against traditional values that have worked well for generations. Not everyone has to agree with every social change."
ALLOW - Opinion on social issuesExample 6: Questioning Official Narratives
"The official explanation doesn't make sense when you look at the evidence. We should be asking more questions instead of accepting everything we're told."
ALLOW - Critical thinkingGuideline: Skepticism toward official positions and preference for traditional values are valid viewpoints. Allow diverse perspectives on controversial topics unless content promotes violence or illegal activity.
Key Principles
- Err on the side of allowing speech in ambiguous cases
- Political opinions and policy criticism receive highest protection
- Personal experiences and individual choices are generally allowed
- Remove only clear violations: violence, illegal activity, targeted harassment
- Context matters - consider intent and overall message